Post by ivykhan885 on Mar 5, 2024 10:10:32 GMT
Likewise, the property inherited from one's mother and father is deemed to be inherited by the person and the other spouse cannot claim rights on this inheritance. Although the defendant's father made a transaction such as a care contract until death and the transfer took place within the marriage union; As a de facto presumption, since such asset transfers made by the mother or father of one of the spouses in the ordinary course of life are considered as gratuitous acquisition (donation), and the opposite of this de facto presumption, that is, they are actually purchased by giving money, the savings is not a gratuitous gain, but a result obtained by giving in return.
The spouse who claims that it is an acquisition, not a real sale Australia Telegram Number Data transaction; Since the plaintiff could not prove his claim with strong and convincing evidence, especially the payment records indicating that the sales price was paid, it was concluded that the plaintiff did not have a receivable right related to the liquidation of the property regime in terms of the immovable property numbered 5088, which was transferred to the defendant by his father. Likewise, the property inherited from one's mother and father is deemed to be inherited by the person and the other spouse cannot claim rights on this inheritance. Although the defendant's father made a transaction such as a care contract until death and the transfer took place within the marriage union; As a de facto presumption, since such asset transfers made by the mother or father of one of the spouses in the ordinary course of life are considered as gratuitous acquisition (donation),
And the opposite of this de facto presumption, that is, they are actually purchased by giving money, the savings is not a gratuitous gain, but a result obtained by giving in return. The spouse who claims that it is an acquisition, not a real sale transaction; Since the plaintiff could not prove his claim with strong and convincing evidence, especially the payment records indicating that the sales price was paid, it was concluded that the plaintiff did not have a receivable right related to the liquidation of the property regime in terms of the immovable property numbered 5088, which was transferred to the defendant by his father.
The spouse who claims that it is an acquisition, not a real sale Australia Telegram Number Data transaction; Since the plaintiff could not prove his claim with strong and convincing evidence, especially the payment records indicating that the sales price was paid, it was concluded that the plaintiff did not have a receivable right related to the liquidation of the property regime in terms of the immovable property numbered 5088, which was transferred to the defendant by his father. Likewise, the property inherited from one's mother and father is deemed to be inherited by the person and the other spouse cannot claim rights on this inheritance. Although the defendant's father made a transaction such as a care contract until death and the transfer took place within the marriage union; As a de facto presumption, since such asset transfers made by the mother or father of one of the spouses in the ordinary course of life are considered as gratuitous acquisition (donation),
And the opposite of this de facto presumption, that is, they are actually purchased by giving money, the savings is not a gratuitous gain, but a result obtained by giving in return. The spouse who claims that it is an acquisition, not a real sale transaction; Since the plaintiff could not prove his claim with strong and convincing evidence, especially the payment records indicating that the sales price was paid, it was concluded that the plaintiff did not have a receivable right related to the liquidation of the property regime in terms of the immovable property numbered 5088, which was transferred to the defendant by his father.